home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: giskard.demon.co.uk!dale
- From: dale@giskard.demon.co.uk (Dale Shuttleworth)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: 28.8 baud & telco responsibilities
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 18:47:29 GMT
- Organization: Dale's home Linux box.
- Message-ID: <Dou6v6.DF@giskard.demon.co.uk>
- References: <todamhyp-2802961822500001@bhppp31.bluehawk.com> <4h4kaf$dla@netaxs.com> <313E5A6E.74DE@mbr.centra.ca> <4hmtqt$9il@news2.cais.com> <313F76CA.384E@interramp.com> <4ii4tm$e7q@castle.nando.net> <314D2C1E.6513@accutek.com>
- X-NNTP-Posting-Host: giskard.demon.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
-
- Hi,
-
- Stephen Satchell (satchell@accutek.com) wrote:
-
- [...]
-
- : Pacific Bell put in their original 1MB and 1FL tariffs that they would
- : handle "4800 baud", but quickly amended their filing to make that read
- : "4800 bps" when they discovered their mistake. (Hint: you can't get
- : 4800 baud [symbols/second] across a voice-grade telephone line; the
- : practical limit is around 3800 baud.)
-
- You can get 4800 baud through an ordinary phone line if you use AM.
- I don't really recommend it, but it is possible...
-
- Dale.
- --
- ******************************************************************************
- * Dale Shuttleworth *
- * Email: dale@giskard.demon.co.uk *
- ******************************************************************************
-